1. Introduction
During
the past decades, many people believed in the idea that the
rural areas did not have an important role in economic development.
The process of migration from the countryside to the cities,
especially in southern countries, was based in the image of
the urban areas as the main places to find economic opportunities.
In
fact, the rural areas are very rich and concentrate the majority
of natural resources, such as water, farm land, minerals,
and biodiversity. It's not a coincidence that international
financial institutions, like the World Bank, focus their projects
on these regions.
The
World Bank has a clear policy regarding the so-called "land
markets". Its strategy includes the following programs:
land surveys and mapping, land titling with alienable titles,
facilitation of land markets, credit based on the "willing-seller
/ willing-buyer" formula, "partnerships" between
rural workers and landowners, and privatization of all land
and natural resources.
The
Bank ideology defends the idea of keeping "small governments".
Its policies benefit large landowners and corporations, increasing
land concentration. According to these policies, small farmers
should become more "efficient" by incorporating
themselves into the agrobusiness sector.
The
World Bank has been implementing these projects all over the
world, always following the same formula, and generating similar
effects. In order to deal with this problem, several community-based
organizations and grassroots movements created an international
network to monitor and denounce the negative impacts of World
Bank policies. The goal of the Land Research and Action Network
is to create alternative proposals and to promote the policies
proposed by the Via Campesina-a network of peasants and small
farmers in 60 countries.
These
organizations believe that a financial institution like the
World Bank should not have such a strong influence in determining
policies for rural areas, including mechanisms for the appropriation
of land and natural resources. Each country should determine
its own public policy, according to the historic and current
demands of each society. In this context, the rural grassroots
organizations should play a central role in implementing policies
that guarantee a democratic distribution of land and the preservation
of natural resources.
2.
The World Bank Under Suspicion
3.
The "Traps" inherent in
Land Market Policies
4.
Brazil
5.
Colombia
6.
Guatemala
7.
India
8.
Mexico
9.
South Africa
10.
Thailand
11.
Zimbabwe
12.
Positions of Via Campesina
13.
Bibliography
14.
Table of Contents
|